dead live longer ... or something ... A few days ago I thought about it fleetingly, as long as my body is probably still join in. It would not have stayed with the idea. Now call the 15-16 hours of work took its toll - sick to death (ok, I'm inclined to drama) I'm arrived yesterday at G., my body, so to speak off for repair. The flu has me thanks neck wrap, antibiotics, and loving care in the not so under control. The artisans on the ground floor nerves are enormous with the noise they cause, but G. is happy that they now the expansion can devote and spend the day on the ground floor.
my shock this week I've already gone - she could have been so thoroughly abtrainiert to worry about a - and said this brought me hot tea ... I've it? Why? How? Or is it the account of my predecessors? I'm too sick to auseinanderzudividieren something now ... Meanwhile, it should
G. probably noticed that I am on the "my-home-is-my-castle" principle knit and this fixed constant need in my life - my rock in the surf * smile *. Does not turn that I clumsily through the large, wide World taps - the opposite is probably true. This black-and-white principle (there are certainly here and there) strikes me not to -. Not either or, but both ^ ^ I finally Sarrazin book! are of course supplies the provinces last, first come the turn of the cities, in contrast to the long delivery time can be up to in our book shops ANA explain. (My mother would probably experience a shock if they knew where ANA is - certainly not in HH or B or me from M and certainly not with BO). The Mirror published the chapter promises an interesting read. But it is still untouched by the bed - at first I read "The End of Patience: consistently against juvenile perpetrators of violence" by Kirsten Heisig over. Although all conclusions are well-known general, it does not hurt to check anyway. In the new "Superillu" (... what a stupid name ... rarely) some theses Sarrazin will be scrutinized on the following principle: theory - criticism - reality. Not bad, especially the conclusion. I quote:
Sarrazin's book is controversial, it is inconvenient, the word choice often undiplomatic and harsh - and some of his theses may also be controversial or even wrong. But the demonization that we have seen, neither work nor author is fair. Particularly embarrassing is the fact that many celebrities are becoming as fast as aufgrnd vernichtenten verdict of some pre-release excerpts have carried away, without having read the book at all. This is not only unfair, but stupid.
course, this applies not only famous for any infamous Persons but also for many "ordinary" people. Of course, is very clever of me to talk about it without having read it myself * smile *... But it is ultimately not just about the book, but also the waves that it proposes.
Here the link: http://www.superillu.de/aktuell/SUPERillu_analysiert_Thilo_Sarrazins_Thesen_1771428.html
What decided the dismissal terms Sarrazin, it is my opinion most clearly: Why Sarrazin is charged with a prohibition? Because of controversial theories and uncomfortable? Without wanting to be doomsayers, but where's the freedom of expression? Because it is an opinion (definitely critical) and not incitement, including law slope of the allegations raised against him.
Welcome to the DDR 2.0?
Disk ions on the topic can be found here including: http://www.pi-news.net/2010/09/sarrazin-entlassung-beschlossen/
course I've missed all kinds of letters with the former finance minister - maybe even bring anything? And, yesterday they even on the news that No. 1 topic of conversation no mention ... Why?
